Localisation Dashboard

UA

Q: Who actually has power to influence in coordination and decision-making processes?

Q: Who actually has power to participate in coordination and decision-making processes?

Influence and Participation

Influence of different actors according to… (max: 5)

According to: All According to: Local or National Organisation According to: International NGO

Local actors participate at a moderate level (72%), while international actors participate at a high level (80%). The data suggests a slight discrepancy in participation levels, though international actors still play a more active role in decision-making processes.

We asked: On a scale of 1 to 5, how much influence do different organizations have in the CP AoR, where, 1 = No influence, 2 = Limited influence, 3 = Moderate influence, 4 = Influential, 5 = Very highly influential

Participation of different actors according to… (max: 5)

According to: All According to: Local or National Organisation According to: International NGO

We asked: On a scale of 1 to 5, how much do different organizations participate in CP AoR where, 1 = No participation, 2 = Limited participation, 3 = Moderate participation, 4 = High participation, 5 = Very high participation

Local and National actors shape humanitarian priorities (max: 4)

According to: All According to: Local or National Organisation According to: International NGO

Local and national actors score similarly across the board (80%) in shaping humanitarian priorities, showing that these actors are becoming integral in guiding the direction of interventions and strategies.

Influence and Participation Gap (max: 5)

Participation Gap

There is a gap of about 10% between influence and participation, particularly for local actors, underscoring challenges in fully integrating local organizations into both decision-making and active participation.

Participation in Sub-national coordination

International National UN agency Red cross

National NGOs dominate sub-national coordination, particularly in regions like Sumska (80%), Kharkivska (77%), and Zaporizka (76%), whereas international organizations and UN agencies are less represented across most regions.

Info

Total: 60 responses

NNGO: 35 responses

INGO: 25 responses

Governance and Decision Making

Partnerships and Funding

Capacity

Localisation Dashboard

UA

Influence and Participation

Influence of different actors according to… (max: 5)

Local actors participate at a moderate level (72%), while international actors participate at a high level (80%). The data suggests a slight discrepancy in participation levels, though international actors still play a more active role in decision-making processes.

Participation of different actors according to… (max: 5)

Local and National actors shape humanitarian priorities (max: 4)

Local and national actors score similarly across the board (80%) in shaping humanitarian priorities, showing that these actors are becoming integral in guiding the direction of interventions and strategies.

Influence and Participation Gap (max: 5)

There is a gap of about 10% between influence and participation, particularly for local actors, underscoring challenges in fully integrating local organizations into both decision-making and active participation.

Participation in Sub-national coordination

National NGOs dominate sub-national coordination, particularly in regions like Sumska (80%), Kharkivska (77%), and Zaporizka (76%), whereas international organizations and UN agencies are less represented across most regions.

Info